Mirena Uterus Perforation Claims Dominate MDL Proceeding

A large number of Mirena lawsuits filed against Bayer claim serious injuries, including Mirena uterus perforation, associated with the IUD migration. The product labeling only informs of the minuscule risk of potential “uterine perforation at the time of insertion.” However, post-marketing surveys and product liability litigations confirm that the problem is much more common and Mirena uterus perforation takes place months or even years after the IUD implanted. Design defect in the T-shaped plastic intrauterine birth control device facilitates its displacement from the inserted site and migration, a subject of rampant complaint, resulting in complete or partial uterus damage, surgeries, adhesion, scarring, infertility, and harm to internal organs.

Mirena Uterus Perforation claims

Of about 1,200 Mirena lawsuits consolidated under the federal MDL rules at a New York southern district court and over 2,000 under the New Jersey state MCL centralization, the highest number of claims are linked to IUD migration and perforation. Women injured by the device migration highlight that the IUD spontaneously dislodge, moves through uterine organs, and gets embedded in the pelvic cavity leading to pain, injuries, and surgical removal. Reproductive organs, such uterus and fallopian tube, due to their proximity, are injured, sometimes beyond repair, as the IUD gets struck in or perforate them. At least 2,000 women were forced to remove the damaged uterus as the device perforated them beyond the repair while more than double of that number were advised against pregnancy, as the uterus is injured significantly by the migrating Mirena.

More than two-dozen Californian women filed a lawsuit in 2014 claiming that they had uterus removal surgery following Mirena perforation. Lawsuits seek manufacturer’s liability for manufacturing defect and “marketing the IUD without sufficiently warning of potential risks and complications.”

Mirena perforation forced hundreds of women to opt for surgical removal of the IUD and undergo additional surgeries, including hysterectomy, appendectomy, and pelvic surgery. There are instances where women have been surgically induced menopause following vaginal hemorrhage caused by Mirena perforation. The Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons has acknowledged the problem and informed its members about the effects.

Second Mirena MDL Bellwether Trial

Mirena MDL Judge Cathy Seibel has selected five lawsuits in July to have a second round of bellwether trial. The submission of case specific reports this set of claims is expected to over by February 2016. Judge Siebel may decide on the trial date within a month. The MDL was established in April 2013 to cater to the surge in Mirena injury litigations. In August 2014, the Initial Disposition Pool was created with 12 litigations. The first Mirena bellwether trial involving six lawsuits is set for March 7, 2016. Court Judge Brian Matinotti heading the New Jersey Mirena MCL has also in the disposition pool and set in place the motion selection for the second bellwether trial.

Bellwether trials are expected to guide lawyers and claimants on potential evidence, defendant disposition, and juror response to accusations in the Mirena mass litigation. Potential decisions against Bayer may trigger settlement negotiations with plaintiffs.

Kentucky Court Accepts Strict Liability, Misrepresentation Claim

An August 7 order issued by a Kentucky federal court allowed the strict liability and negligent misrepresentation claim of a woman injured by Mirena IUD. The plaintiff had severe headaches and vision loss within six months of using the contraceptive device. She also had permanent injuries associated with the IUD side effects.

The court ruled that “an injured party can advance both a strict-liability claim and a negligence claim against the manufacturer of a product for injury suffered by that product because the strict liability claim focuses on the condition of the product, while the negligence action addresses the manufacturer’s duties to end-users.”

If you have or any of your relatives has experienced IUD injuries, including uterus perforation, contact our Mirena injury lawyer or call on 1-800-632-1404 to explore options to get financial compensation for physical suffering, trauma, economic losses, and non-economic damages.

October 19, 2015

Court Rejects Bayer’s Objection, Allows Delayed Mirena Lawsuit

Amid calls to withdraw the Mirena IUD from market in the face of risks the birth control device could cause, Mirena lawsuit counts continue to grow. The IUD contraceptive once a favorite of women across all ages is now in the thick of controversy for complaints of migration and surgical injury associated with it.

Mirena Lawsuit Not Dismissed

A recent Mirena lawsuit filed in a Minnesota federal court highlights how a 26-year-old woman suffered uterus damage and other complications even after the IUD was removed. In another instance, a New Mexico court allowed a Mirena migration and perforation claim to proceed despite delayed filing considering the gravity of the case.

Judge William P. Lynch of New Mexico overruled Bayer’s objection highlighting delayed submission of notice to allow plaintiff Melissa Beauprez to proceed with her Mirena lawsuit. The court acknowledged “a certain sloppiness and inattention to detail” on the part of the Mirena attorney representing the plaintiff, but refused to dismiss the claim.

Melissa had a Mirena IUD implant in 2009. She went for removal after having persistent back pain and other symptoms for two years. According to her Mirena lawyer, X-ray and CT scans revealed that she was a victim of IUD migration and doctors performed an invasive surgery to remove the device embedded in her abdomen. The Mirena lawsuit seeks strict liability citing “defective product, failure to warn consumers, concealment of information, breach of implied warranty, and fraudulent practice.”

The litigation was first filed by Beauprez’s Mirena attorney in July 2014 without complying with the procedure of “serving a copy of the claim notice to IUD manufacturer Bayer.” The court ordered the plaintiff to provide the defendant a copy of the notice “no later than Dec. 17, 2014, Plaintiff must either effect service or provide the Court with a written explanation why service has not been effected.” But technical problems resulted in the notice reaching to Bayer five days later on December 22.

The defendant made the delay an issue and sought the dismissal of the Mirena lawsuit. However, the court ruled over the objection and accepted the contention of plaintiff’s Mirena lawyer that there was no deliberate delay in serving the notice and it was due miscommunication between him and another out-of-state attorney.

CDC Report Confirms Mirena Pregnancy Complication Risk

According to a recent report by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, women getting pregnant while using Mirena IUD face the enhanced risk of abortion and other complications. This makes it hard a choice for women who accidentally become pregnant as the birth control device slips away and migrates. If they go for surgical removal of the displaced IUD, the injury and complication risks are high. If they do not, they face equally danger of suffering from abortion and other serious complications.

The report cites the potential risk of septic abortion, pre-term delivery, and serious infections, such as chorioamnionitis, in women becoming pregnant following Mirena migration. Prepared by the Reproductive Health Division, it warns that presence of the device may expose the fetus to synthetic hormones and 80 percent such pregnancies end up in abortions. There are many Mirena lawsuits filed claiming fetal death, miscarriages, and ectopic pregnancy.

However, a 2013 report in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology cited the risk of complications endangering both mother and child when a Mirena removal surgery is performed on a pregnant woman. There are also instances where strings could not be located and no removal surgery was performed.

A Mirena lawsuit filed by an Alabama couple a few months ago demonstrated how a pregnancy with Mirena IUD inside could cause havoc. The displacement of the T-shaped IUD led to the accidental pregnancy and the mother did not undergo the removal surgery for fear of fatal risk to both mother and the fetus and also the strings were not there. The newborn child had “preterm delivery, right-sided diaphragmatic hernia, pulmonary hypertension, degenerated right pulmonary artery, a large patent ductus-arteriosis (PDA), and persistent fetal oxygenation” attributed to exposure to artificial hormone released by the IUD. The baby died within 36 hours.

Contact Our Mirena Attorney Today

May 24, 2015

Mirena Lawsuits Mounts, Attorneys Flooded With Claims

FREE MIRENA CASE EVALUATIONS: CALL 1-800-632-1404

It is already 3,000, but no stoppage for the filing of Mirena lawsuits. Every Mirena attorney is flooded with claims and busy evaluating and filing the most appropriate ones keeping in view the statute of limitations in each individual case. With over 70,000 adverse injuries reported to the FDA officially and thousands gone unreported, the state and federal pools are likely to expand immensely in the coming days.

Mirena Lawsuit Alleges Pelvic Injury

A recently filed Mirena injury lawsuit has sought compensatory and punitive damages from Bayer claiming that its IUD contraceptive perforated and injured plaintiff’s pelvic organs. Filed in a Massachusetts district court, the litigant claims that design defect let the device migrate from its place and “perforated the anterior region of her pelvis, requiring surgical removal.”

The plaintiff experienced severe abdominal pain and infection two year after the IUD was inserted. Diagnosis revealed that the Mirena birth control was embedded with her pelvic structure. She underwent surgery to remove it. Her Mirena lawyer holds the manufacturer responsible for the injury because of its “failure to warn, fraudulent misrepresentation of safety information, and introduction of defective birth control IUD.” She had “injuries to her pelvic organs and formation of adhesions” in the migrated area.

Federal Court Seeks Second Disposition Pool

The New York federal court looking after the Mirena MDL has sought preparation of second disposition pool. The bellwether trial of the first group of Mirena lawsuits is expected to be in March 2016 following discovery and pretrial rulings by Judge Cathy Seibel. The outcome is to impact the verdict in 1,500 liability claims part of the MDL until now.

Issued on April 20, the latest order calls for selection of 15 Mirena lawsuits to be the part of the second pool by July 2. Mirena attorneys representing plaintiffs and the defendants are to select five each while another five claims are to be chosen randomly. Four of these lawsuits are expected to be tried first at the end of 2016 or early 2017.

Meanwhile, the New Jersey state MDL has completed the creation of the second disposition pool. The first group of over 1,800 Mirena lawsuits is slated for early 2016 trial while the second pool will undergo trail in the second half of that year.

Call on 1-800-632-1404 consult our Mirena injury attorney to evaluate your case and ask for compensation covering past and future medical expenses, loss of employment, and physical suffering.

To Contact a Mirena Injury Lawyer:

CALL TOLL FREE: (800) 632-1404

EMAIL: clicking here.

FILL OUT THIS FORM FOR FREE HELP:

NOTE: Our team of attorneys will review potential cases for all fifty states, including Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin and Wyoming.

May 21, 2015

Mirena Lawsuits Mounts, Attorneys Flooded With Claims

FREE MIRENA CASE EVALUATIONS: CALL 1-800-632-1404

It is already 3,000, but there appears to be no stoppage for the filing of Mirena lawsuits. Every Mirena attorney is flooded with claims and is busy evaluating and filing the most appropriate ones. With over 70,000 adverse injuries reported to the FDA officially and thousands gone unreported, the state and federal pools are likely to expand immensely in the coming days.

Mirena Lawsuit Alleges Pelvic Injury

Federal Court Seeks Second Disposition Pool

Mississippi Women Sues Lawyers for Botched Mirena Lawsuit

A Mississippi woman has been suing three Mirena lawyers claiming that the delay in filing her IUD injury claim led to lapse of statute of limitations and dismissal of the lawsuit. “Lawyers claiming experience in ‘bad drug’ litigation allowed the statute of limitations on plaintiff’s underlying claim to lapse, thereby forever barring plaintiff from receiving compensation for the serious injuries that she suffered as a result of the defective Mirena IUD,” reads her suit seeking $500,000 in damages citing negligence and breach of fiduciary duty by three law farms.

A Mirena attorney is expected to evaluate and file any claim depending on specific state statute of limitations. Though delayed filing is granted in some cases, inordinate time lag allows the defendant to seek the dismissal of your claim and courts usually adhere to it.

Call on 1-800-632-1404 consult our Mirena injury attorney to evaluate your case and ask for compensation covering past and future medical expenses, loss of employment, and physical suffering.

To Contact a Mirena Injury Lawyer:

CALL TOLL FREE: (800) 632-1404

EMAIL: clicking here.

FILL OUT THIS FORM FOR FREE HELP:

March 2, 2015

Mirena Attorney Expects More Lawsuits as IUD Injury Libel Crosses 2,500 Mark

FREE MIRENA CASE EVALUATIONS: CALL 1-800-632-1404

The recent dismissal of 31 Mirena IUD lawsuits by New York Judge Cathy Seibel has failed to dent the surge in product liability claims involving the birth control. With the original libel going beyond the 2,500 mark and growing awareness on IUD side effects and defective medical device legal action, a Mirena attorney predicts considerable expansion in the litigation size. Hundreds of claimants are joining MDL centralizations at Southern New York District Court and Bergen County Superior Court of New Jersey each month while reports continue to highlight the injury and plight of users.

Plaintiffs have alleged that the IUD birth control caused them to suffer from following injuries while manufacturer Bayer failed to warn them about potential side effects.

Spontaneous Mirena migration leading to unwanted pregnancy
Perforation of uterus and pelvic organs
Damage to uterus and its removal
Surgical removal of the IUD
Side effects leading to invasive surgeries
Abnormal menstrual change and abdominal cramps
Ectopic pregnancy and ovarian cysts
Post-use pregnancy-related side effects, including miscarriages
Vaginal disorders
Streptococcal sepsis and pelvic diseases

New York Federal Mirena IUD Lawsuit MDL

According to the latest data, over 1,160 IUD migration and injury lawsuits have been filed by Mirena attorneys in different federal courts. The first trial, which will have six claims and a steering influence on subsequent claims, is set to be held in March 2016. Meanwhile, the judge dismissed 31 lawsuits as “time-barred” on January 9. As many as 12 plaintiffs from Louisiana, 17 from California, one each from Ohio and Oklahoma found their IUD lawsuits dismissed for failing to comply with the statutes of limitations.

Judge Seibel felt sorry for California plaintiffs and noted that their lawsuits could “not be tested on the merits because of a poor choice by their Mirena injury lawyers as to where to file.”

New Jersey Mirena Lawsuit MDL

More than 1,500 Mirena IUD migration and injury litigations are pending at the Bergen County Superior Court. Court records indicate at least 150 new lawsuits have been filed by Mirena attorneys in the last two months. February 24 has been fixed as the date for the Case Management Conference.

All Mirena lawsuits focus on IUD migration, the biggest adverse event related to the birth control. This includes allegations of infertility, organ damage, and pelvic perforations. Many claims have highlighted a “Warning Letter Bayer received from the FDA in 2009 that took issue with Mirena promotional materials that the agency said were misleading because they exaggerated the IUD’s benefit and understated its risks.”

New Mirena Lawsuits Continue To Pour In

Thanks to the efforts of Mirena attorneys and consumer groups, both IUD lawsuits and complaints continue to pour in. One of the recent Mirena claims filed by a Cleveland woman alleges that she experienced painful cramps and the agony multiplied with time. She underwent ultrasound to locate the displaced IUD and surgery to remove it. The plaintiff’s uterus was damaged so badly that her gynecologist found her unsuitable to become pregnant.

Another Illinois woman underwent surgery after the migrating IUD led to bowel problems and acute stomach pain. Her Mirena injury lawyer insists that the birth control also resulted in pelvic inflammatory infection, which might be a cause of infertility.

The plaintiffs suffered from complications because of Mirena IUD migration and side effects have the right to seek product liability and demand financial damages covering economic and non-economic losses. Contact Mirena attorney or call on 1-800-632-1404 to evaluate your case and ask for compensation covering past and future medical expenses, loss of employment, and physical suffering.

To Contact a Mirena Injury Lawyer:

CALL TOLL FREE: (800) 632-1404

EMAIL: clicking here.

FILL OUT THIS FORM FOR FREE HELP:

December 12, 2014

Mirena Attorney: Evaluate Your Perforation Litigation Claim

Do you have a potential Mirena lawsuit claim?

FREE MIRENA CASE EVALUATIONS: CALL 1-800-632-1404

Contact a Mirena attorney if you have a potential product liability claim against its manufacturer. The T-shaped IUD is known to migrate spontaneously from the uterine cavity and perforate the uterus, fallopian tube, and other internal organs leading to serious injuries. At least 70,000 Mirena side effects were reported to the FDA ever since the birth control device was approved in 2000. Research studies have blamed the intrauterine contraceptive for causing breast cancer, intracranial hypertension, and crippling joint problems in users.

Check If You Have Mirena Side Effects

Meet your Mirena attorney to discuss about the filing of your prospective lawsuit, if you have experienced any of the following adverse events.

Mirena Migration and Perforation Injuries

Spontaneous Mirena IUD expulsion leading to pregnancy
IUD migration resulting in injuries
Uterus perforation or surgical removal
injury to internal organs
invasive surgical interventions to remove the IUD or heal injuries caused

Changes in Menstrual Pattern

Changes in the menstrual pattern, including irregular spotting
Shorter menstrual cycle
Bleeding or stoppage of menstrual periods
Abdominal pain or cramps

Pregnancy Adverse Events

Ectopic pregnancy
Become pregnant while using the IUD
Early labor pain or miscarriage following Mirena use
Damaged uterus make pregnancy unviable

Mirena Infection and Inflammation Side Effects

Streptococcal sepsis because of the IUD-related infection
Pelvic inflammatory diseases
Gonorrhea

Vaginal Problems

Painful ovarian cysts
Vaginal watery discharges
Painful sexual intercourse
Bleeding and smell

Are You On the Same Side?

A New Jersey woman had to undergo invasive surgical procedures to remove the displaced Mirena IUD while she was pregnant. Just 24-year-old, she selected the contraceptive over other birth control methods considering its safe and better. However, the device migrated and failed to protect her from being pregnant. Additionally, she endured pain and had complicated and life-threatening surgeries to remove the T-shaped object.

Another resident of Californian, a 32-year-old woman, filed a product liability Mirena lawsuit claiming that the migrating IUD damaged her fallopian tube and uterus wall beyond repair. Tracy, a young Ohio woman barely 21 years, went for surgeries after doctors discovered that IUD severely damaged her uterus. The Mirena attorney representing her claims that the woman now has to live with “no-viable pregnancy” condition for life.

Two women from Oklahoma have sought millions in damages highlighting that Mirena migration and perforation forced them to undergo hysterectomies.

Know The Research Findings

An increase of 17 percent in Mirena side effect injury complaints in 2013. (DrugRisk report)
About 20 percent increase in the risk of breast cancer linked to Mirena IUD use. (Obstetrics & Gynecology journal, July 2014)
Research warnings about life-long-term Mirena side effects on young women. (American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, February 2013)
Warning by the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons on potential Mirena perforation risks.
Young women at increased risk of Mirena injuries. (Obstetrics & Gynecology journal, October 2014)
Mirena birth control enhances rheumatoid arthritis risk by 268 percent. (American College of Rheumatology meet 2014)

Learn About Mirena Lawsuit

According to the latest update, at least 1,228 Mirena lawsuits have been filed in New Jersey’s Bergen County Superior Court until November 1, 2014. There were 135 new litigations seeking product liability filed in the last two months. A separate federal MDL has been assigned to a New York southern district court judge, who presides over more than 1,000 lawsuits claiming Mirena side effects. While the first trial is expected to begin in March 2016, Mirena attorneys are busy with evaluating large number of organ perforation and other adverse events reports.

Discover Product Liability Benefits

If you have experienced Mirena injuries, you are at liberty to file product liability lawsuit against IUD manufacturer Bayer seeking financial compensation for suffering, trauma, economic losses, and non-economic damages.

To know about the process for filing lawsuit over Mirena migration injury and seek defective medical device product liability claims citing IUD migration and perforations, please contact Mirena attorney or call on 1-800-632-1404.

To Contact a Mirena Injury Lawyer:

CALL TOLL FREE: (800) 632-1404

EMAIL: clicking here.

FILL OUT THIS FORM FOR FREE HELP:

November 11, 2014

Young Women at Increased Risk of Mirena Migration Injuries, New Study Claims

FREE MIRENA CASE EVALUATIONS: CALL 1-800-632-1404

Mirena migration injuries are more likely to occur in younger women, according to a new study published in the Obstetrics & Gynecology journal. More than half of 2,000 Mirena lawsuits filed in federal and state courts allege that the design defect allows the intrauterine birth control device to eject voluntarily and migrate. Since 2008, over 5,000 women have informed the FDA that the IUD moved out of the uterine cavity on its own and caused serious injuries to other body parts while migrating. Mirena attorneys across the United States are evaluating thousands of such potential legal claims for filing defective medical device product liability suits.

Research Warns Teens of Mirena Migration Injury, Rejects AAP Advisory

Reported in October 2014, the latest study warns that the risk of IUD expulsion is higher in users aged between 14 and 19. Of 5,400 case studies of Mirena and Paragard users studied, one in every 10 found her IUD displaced over a period of 36 months. An investigation showed the prominent role of the age factor in enhancing the menace of ejection. Teens face two-fold expulsion and injury risk than those in their 20s and 30s. The study corroborates the findings of two earlier studies, where doctors stopped short of recommending the IUD to women who had not yet given birth fearing Mirena migration injuries.

The latest revelations came in the backdrop of the recommendations by the American Academy of Pediatrics advocating use of Mirena and similar IUD birth controls by young women. Last month, the AAP advises doctors to appraise IUD benefits to teens and their guardians considering birth control pills. It suggested that teens should consider long-term pregnancy prevention methods, such as Mirena IUDs, to avoid everyday action that many tend to forget.

The study indicating higher chance of unexpected expulsion that may accompany serious injuries and potential risk of uterus damage raises concern over safety of birth control IUDs. Though the AAP advisory mentioned the possibility of infection linked to the IUD, it did not address the growing fears relating to spontaneous Mirena migration, which had played havoc with thousands of women rendering them childless or live with debilitating internal injuries.

An analysis of the MedWatch reports indicates as many as 72,000 Mirena side effect complaints made their way to the FDA since the IUD birth control was launched in 2000. About 47,000 adverse events reported in the last five years claimed Mirena migration while at least 1,300 users had uterus perforations during the same time. Actual figures may be much higher as many about 90% of such events go unreported.

Potential Mirena Migration Injury

Voluntary IUD expulsion and migration
Users becoming pregnant without being aware of IUD ejection
Uterus perforation and damage to reproductive organs
Partially damaged uterus make pregnancy unstable and prone to miscarriage
Internal injuries caused by Mirena embedded to pelvic organs
Hysterectomy or surgical removal of damaged uterus
Multiple surgical interventions to remove migrated Mirena IUD and prevent spread of injury it causes
Life-threatening surgery to remove the IUD in a women who becomes pregnant due to Mirena expulsion
Streptococcal sepsis due to Mirena migration injuries

Do I Have Mirena Lawsuit?

Bayer, the IUD manufacturer, is defending more than 1,000 Mirena product liability litigations centralized at a Southern District federal court of New York. An equal numbers of Mirena lawsuits are consolidated at New Jersey’s Bergen County Superior Court for pretrial proceedings and discovery. The claims against the manufacturer include liability for its failure to warn about IUD side effects and risk of implant expulsion leading to complications, invasive surgical interventions, and injuries.

To Contact a Mirena Injury Lawyer:

CALL TOLL FREE: (800) 632-1404

EMAIL: clicking here.

FILL OUT THIS FORM FOR FREE HELP:

October 16, 2014October 16, 2014

Mirena Lawsuit Filed After Birth Control IUD Invaded Rectum

mirena-lawyer — Contact A Mirena Lawyer To File IUD Injury Lawsuit

FREE MIRENA CASE EVALUATIONS: CALL 1-800-632-1404

A Mirena lawsuit filed recently claims that the birth control IUD perforated the uterus and migrated to the rectum causing unsettling harm to the plaintiff. The T-shaped device is already in the thick of controversy following over 70,000 complaints on the MedWatch reporting system. Mirena migration led to more than 4,500 serious injuries and over 2,000 uterus removal or repair surgeries in the last five years. Jenifer opted for Mirena birth control IUD in July 2012. She felt acute pain and pregnancy symptoms in the following weeks forcing her to meet her doctor. To her surprise, Jenifer was found to be pregnant despite having the IUD for over a month. Ultrasound imaging even could not discover the Mirena birth control in her uterus and pelvic area, the lawsuit claims. The plaintiff was admitted to hospital after she miscarried. Doctors performed surgeries on her a month later to locate the wandering Mirena IUD in her stomach, spleen, and liver without any success. A rectal exam necessitated by incessant abdominal pain led to the discovery of the contraceptive in the rectum of the patient. She had a Mirena removal surgery to get rid of it. Medical reports concluded that the device migrated from her uterus causing Jenifer to become pregnant and moved into her rectum. Its presence also led to her miscarriage, the Mirena lawsuit alleged. Jenifer’s Mirena lawyer has sought product liability and punitive damages from Bayer for marketing defective IUD contraceptive that caused her to undergo surgeries, miscarriage, and suffering.

Mirena Lawsuits Over IUD Migration and Injuries

Mirena is a T-shaped device implanted in the uterus releases synthetic levonorgestrel that thickens uterine membrane and prevents fertilization by sperms. However, the design defect allows the IUD to slip away from its place of implant and moved away. It results in unwanted pregnancy defeating the main objective of the users. The biggest threat is the ability of the intrauterine device to drift away and damage pelvic organs, including the uterus, that may end the chance to become pregnant again, agrees any Mirena attorney representing women injured because of the migrated IUD. About 2,000 Mirena lawsuits and research reports reported in the last few years indicate the fact that IUD migration can cause serious and debilitating injuries, such as

perforation of uterus and internal organs
embedding with internal organs
damage to reproductive organs
hysterectomy
removal surgeries
invasive additional surgical interventions
surgery while become pregnancy
vaginal hemorrhage

Mirena Lawsuits Following Research, FDA Warnings

Two medical surveys conducted in 2012 were among the first research studies to highlight the dangers of Mirena injuries. Studies, one supported by the American Public Health Association and the other sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, highlighted concerns about the possibility of injuries caused by the IUD birth control. Doctors favored other contraceptive options for the possibility of damages to uterus linked to Mirena. A 2014 research report in the Obstetrics & Gynecology journal links Mirena to breast cancer risk. Women using the IUD to “treat heavy periods” are at the enhanced danger of developing cancerous and non-cancerous tumors. Over a dozen of Mirena lawsuits have been filed claiming intracranial hypertension and other neurological problems due to the birth control side effects. In 2010, the FDA Bad Ad Program warned Bayer for overstating efficacy of Mirena without disclosing its potential injury side effects. Despite the warning, the manufacturer did not inform users about the IUD migration and perforation risks that now Mirena lawyers have made the keystone of their product liability claim.

Mirena Lawsuit: Contact Experienced an Mirena Attorney

With the continued fling of new Mirena lawsuits highlighting injuries and side effects associated with IUD birth control, Bayer Healthcare is bracing to face one of the biggest litigations in its history. Its claim of marketing a safe device holds little merit when contested by women subject to uterus damages, invasive surgeries, hypertension, pelvic infections, ovarian cysts, vaginal problems, post-removal birth problems, and other health problems. Victims of Mirena injuries have the right to file product liability claims and seek compensation for their suffering, health complications, life-long trauma, loss of employment, and medical expenditure. To know about the process for filing Mirena lawsuit and seeking defective medical device product liability claims citing IUD migration and perforations, please contact us or call on 1-800-632-1404.

To Contact a Mirena Injury Lawyer:

CALL TOLL FREE: (800) 632-1404 EMAIL: clicking here. FILL OUT THIS FORM FOR FREE HELP:

August 22, 2014

Mirena Lawsuit Filed Over Mirena Injury: Perforation and Surgery

FREE MIRENA CASE EVALUATIONS: CALL 1-800-632-1404

Mirena Injury Perforation Lawsuit: Women Claim Serious Uterus Damage, Internal Injuries

More than 1,300 women have undergone hysterectomy and other invasive procedures since 2007 following Mirena perforation of their uterus. Despite claims of assured safety and effective birth control by its manufacturer, Mirena IUD has been reported to the FDA for causing injuries for 47,000 persons in the last five years. Hundreds of women have filed Mirena lawsuits claiming that the levonorgestrel birth control IUD they selected to prevent pregnancy cut through their uterus, fallopian tube, and other pelvic organs, causing them to suffer health hazards. Media reports indicate at least 5,000 women had experienced serious health problems and one or more surgical interventions to treat internal injuries linked to Mirena migration and perforation.

Design Defect Reason for Mirena Perforation

The T-shaped Mirena birth control device is implanted in the uterus. Levonorgestrel hormone released from the contraceptive IUD steadily thickens the cervical mucus that obstructs movement of sperms into the fallopian tube and thus prevents fertilization. Once inserted, the birth control IUD is expected to check unwanted pregnancy for five years.

However, many users have claimed that the design defect allows Mirena IUD to spontaneously dislodge and migrate from its place of insertion and cause extensive injuries. A 2013 report prepared by DrugRisk, a consumer watchdog on adverse events related to prescription drug injuries, highlighted a 17 percent increase in the number of Mirena perforation injury claims compared to the year before.

The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology reported a number of case studies in February 2013 warning of life-long-term adverse impacts on young women due to Mirena perforation of their internal organs and consequent surgeries. The Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons also advised all laparoscopy and endoscopy professionals registered with it about the potential danger of Mirena perforations rendering permanent damage to reproductive organs.

Mirena Perforation Injuries

The most reported Mirena perforation adverse events include:

Damage to uterus caused by the displaced the Mirena IUD
Surgical intervention to get rid of the birth control device embedded to internal organs
Surgery to remove the uterus (hysterectomy) punctured due to the displaced IUD
Perforation of uterus and fallopian tube ending the ability of users to conceive
Additional surgeries and post-operative problems following Mirena perforation complications, such as menopause disorders, tissue excision, pelvic infections, etc.

Mirena Perforation Lawsuit

Of over 1,050 Mirena lawsuits filed so far, a large number of the litigations claim injuries caused by the IUD migration and perforation. A Mirena perforation lawsuit filed in a California court representing 29 women sought product liability on the ground that all plaintiffs were forced to undergo hysterectomy to remove their uterus perforated by displaced IUD beyond repair.

Illinois resident Kellie is suing Bayer claiming that Mirena perforation of her uterus had ended her ability to become a mother. The IUD contraceptive was found to have migrated and embedded with her cervix after puncturing her uterus. She underwent multiple surgeries and advised by doctors against future pregnancy fearing miscarriages and life-threatening complications linked to her damaged uterus.

A 20-year-old South Carolina woman requires surgically induced menopause and regular estrogen treatment to manage severe complications caused by Mirena removal surgery. She underwent multiple surgeries after doctors discovered extensive Mirena perforation injuries damaging her pelvic and reproductive organs. Another Mirena perforation lawsuit filed by AN Ohio resident in December 2013 claims that the users underwent surgery to remove the IUD found attached to her uterus. However, the injuries were so extensive that she was forced to have additional surgeries done for appendectomy and stomach tissue excision.

If you experienced adverse Mirena side effects, required surgery or have a loved one who suffered death following the implantation of Mirena, you may have a potential Mirena lawsuit. Please also visit our Mirena Lawsuit Information Source.

To Contact a Mirena Injury Lawyer:

CALL TOLL FREE: (800) 632-1404

EMAIL: clicking here.

FILL OUT THIS FORM FOR FREE HELP:

January 26, 2014

Spurt in Mirena Side Effect Lawsuits

FREE NATIONWIDE CASE EVALUATIONS: CALL 1-800-632-1404

In December 2013, a 27-year-old Missouri woman filed a product liability lawsuit against Bayer Pharmaceuticals, claiming that she had to undergo a painful surgical removal of Mirena IUD after the device migrated following insertion. The plaintiff has sued Bayer seeking $75,000 in damages for strict product liability, which includes

Failure to warn
Design and manufacture defects
Negligent misrepresentation
Breach of warranties
Fraud by concealment

The lawsuit claims that merely a year after the plaintiff had got the device inserted, she suffered extreme complications, including pain and discharge. She asserts that she had to undergo several sonograms to detect the exact position of the IUD, which had surprisingly migrated from its position inside the uterus to the endometrium and then again to the left side of the abdomen.

Blaming the manufacturer for designing an “unreasonably dangerous and defective product,” the claimant argues that these complications had cost her physically, emotionally, and financially, and she had to incur huge expenses on medical care and treatment.

Mirena Lawsuits

The growing number of Mirena litigations against Bayer only means trouble for the manufacturer, which is being blamed for introducing the defective product in the market and failing to include sufficient warnings for users. Plaintiffs across the country claim that the intrauterince device has arguable flaws, which required them to undergo additional surgery to remove the device that had migrated from its original position. Most of the plaintiffs claim that they not only had to suffer extreme pain and discomfort, but also incur a loss of earning capacity and lost wages due to the alleged result of the complications.

An increasing number of women are coming forward, echoing their misery caused by Mirena complications within 5 years of insertion of the IUD. Lawsuits allege that the defendant failed to sufficiently caution consumers of the risk of Mirena IUD migration following inserted into the uterus of users. Plaintiffs claim that Bayer consistently downplayed potential Mirena side effects merely to maximize profits while risking the safety of the IUD users.

Complainants allege that they suffered from Mirena side effects, including uterine perforations, organ damage, infertility, and ectopic pregnancy, after the spontaneous migration of the contraceptive device despite having been properly inserted by a doctor.

The lawsuits hold the Mirena manufacturer liable for “its promotion of the subject product in an overly aggressive, deceitful, and fraudulent manner, despite evidence as to the product’s defective and dangerous characteristics due to its propensity to cause serious injury and/or death.”

Mirena Attorneys Explore History

Bayer introduced Mirena IUD in the market in 2000 as a contraceptive. Besides, the manufacturer also advertised the contraceptive device as a treatment for those women with heavy menstrual bleeding that were willing to use the IUD for birth control. In 2009, the Federal Drug Administration, FDA, issued a warning to Bayer that it had overstated the benefits of the IUD in one of its Mirena promotions while understating the risks associated with the contraceptive device.

Mirena’s label only states that the device may migrate if the uterus is perforated at the time of insertion, and does not warn potential users about the risk of spontaneous migration of the device.

If you experienced adverse Mirena side effects, required surgery or have a loved one who suffered death following the implantation of Mirena, you may have a potential Mirena lawsuit.

FOR A FREE CASE EVALUATION:

CALL TOLL FREE: (800) 632-1404

EMAIL: clicking here.

FILL OUT THIS FORM FOR FREE HELP: