Thrombosis Risk High From Unretrieved IVG filters

IVC FIlter Attorney

There have been increasing reports of complications from IVC (inferior vena cava) filters, which are supposedly designed to prevent blood clots from traveling to the lungs. A recent study links the IVG filters to thrombosis, claiming that there is a high risk of the devices puncturing internal organs. As opposed to the manufacturer’s claims that the retrievable devices are designed to prevent blood clots from traveling to the lungs, the filters have been found to fracture inside the body, thus raising the risk of clots and Bard G2 IVC side effects when they are not retrieved for prolonged periods of time.

The University of Rochester Medical Center researchers, who conducted the study published in JACC Cardiovascular Interventions, warn that unretrieved IVC filter causes 2.6-4% of the total cases of deep vein thrombosis.

What are IVC Filters?

In simple words, these are spider-shaped devices placed in the vena cava. These filters are designed to “catch” clots that may break and move freely in the body, blocking them from traveling to different parts of the body, including lungs, causing pulmonary embolism.

However, problems have been reported with retrievable IVC filters, where the displaced devices resulted in severe and fatal injuries. Some of the most severe repercussions of the displacement is the puncturing of the vein and the device moving to the heart or lungs, resulting in fatal consequences.

There have been increasing reports of migration, perforation, and fracturing caused of these retrievable devices. Retrievable filters are designed for patients at a high risk for pulmonary embolism. Since these are retrievable devices, they are removed once the risk has reduced and the filters are no longer needed.

However, if the devices aren’t removed, there is a severe risk of Bard G2 IVC side effects. Moreover, the longer a device remains within the body, the tougher it is to remove, causing severe complications.

The FDA issued an advisory in May 2014, urging doctors to remove IVC filters once the risk of pulmonary embolism had reduced in a patient, basically in one or two months, as there is a risk of fracture and migration if the device is not retrieved, resulting in serious Bard G2 IVC side effects.

Researchers warn that patients with untreated IVC filter blood clots are at a high risk of post-thrombotic syndrome if the device is not retrieved. This risks causing disabling venous claudication, pulmonary embolism, and venous ulceration.

IVC Filter Lawsuits

Hundreds of Bard G2 IVC lawsuits have been filed on behalf of people that have suffered from the migration, fracturing, or perforation of these retrievable devices.

The first litigation was filed in 2010, when the FDA indicated having received 900 adverse event reports about the Bard G2 IVC side effects, of which 328 were about migration of the device, while 146 were about the disintegration of the components. There were 70 reports of perforation and 56 of fracturing, raising concerns of the safety of the filters.

If you or a loved one has suffered from the side effects of these devices, you may have a potential claim against the manufacturer. Our Bard G2 IVC attorney have been representing individuals who have experienced problems with these filters, where the devices have either broken or fractured or even perforated, causing potentially life-threatening injuries.

The IVG filters are unreasonably dangerous. You may be eligible for financial compensation for the pain and suffering. Our IVC filter injury lawyer is reviewing potential Bard G2 IVC filter lawsuits. Contact us or call on 1-800 632-1404 to evaluate any prospective product liability or personal injury claim for yourself, a friend, or family member.

Bard G2 IVC Lawsuits Mount as Patients Allege Poor Filter Design for Severe Complications

bard ivg lawyer

Several individuals nationwide have filed Bard G2 IVC lawsuits against C.R. Bard over problems with the designs of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters. The plaintiffs accuse Bard of introducing defective design product in the market, which allegedly fractures and breaks inside the body, causing severe complications and injuries and death in some cases.

Recently, a widow has filed a product liability and personal injury lawsuit against C.R. Bard, alleging that the Bard G2 retrievable IVC filter failed after it was implanted in her husband’s vena cava. The lawsuit claims that the filter failed and tilted out of its position, puncturing the vein of the plaintiff’s husband and causing the blood clot to move to his heart or lungs. The failure of the device resulted in serious complications and ultimately death of the patient.

All Bard G2 IVC lawsuits share similar allegations, claiming that serious design problems with the filter make them susceptible to migrate to the lungs or heart or tilt out of position or even fracture, eventually failing to prevent heart or pulmonary blood clots. The migration of the metal pieces to the heart or lungs causes severe Bard G2 IVC side effects, resulting in serious injuries and even death.

What is Bard IVC Filter?

Made of metal, the device is designed to prevent blood clots from traveling from deep veins to lungs for people at a risk of suffering pulmonary embolism. Like the first generation G2 filter, the second generation G2 filter is plagued with migration, fracturing, and perforation. The first-generation filter had a very high failure rate, and the speed with which defective device reports are surfacing, it is unlikely that the repackaged Bard G2 IVC filter is any better than its previous version.

Bard G2 IVC lawsuits allege that Bard was aware of the defective IVC filter design, but chose to ignore reports of filter fractures and migration inside the body and continued to market the dangerous devices.

Serious concerns are raised at the potential risk of the spider-like IVC filters. An IVC filter study finds that patients who receive an IVC filter are potentially at a double risk of pulmonary embolism compared to those who take blood thinners alone.

Side Effects

  • Improper placement of the device leads to chronic pelvic pain, migration
  • Puncture or breaking of the device
  • The device may even ‘disappear’ in some cases, becoming undetectable in the body
  • Severe migraine
  • Puncture of the uterus
  • Tear of the colon
  • Severe allergic reactions to the device or any of its metal components

Studies Link Device to Complications

Another study published in the July 2015 issue of JAMA warned of long-term risks of IVC filters, claiming that the risks outnumber the benefits. The failure of Bard in placing warning labels on the device for users to get the temporary device removed within one to two months of implantation has resulted in severe injuries for patients who failed to get the filter removed despite passage of the ideal device removal time. As a result, thousands of people have been severely injured after suffering Bard G2 IVC side effects. Shockingly the injuries were avoidable had the defendant informed users and doctors regarding the timely and diligent removal of the devices.

In May 2014, the FDA urged doctors to remove the temporary filters within 29-54 days of device implantation after there was no longer a risk of pulmonary embolism. The Federal Drug Administration accepted that the medicine fraternity was not adequately warned about the importance of device retrieval.

If you or a loved one has suffered from C.R. Bard G2 IVC side effects, you have a potential claim against C.R. Bard and can seek compensatory damages for the pain, suffering, and trauma. Get in touch with our experienced Bard G2 IVC attorneys to investigate your case and help you get justice. Please call us today at (800) 632-1404 for a free case evaluation.